J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig Search

CLOSE


J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig. > Volume 25(2); 2025 > Article
Feng and Kim: Risk Assessment for Compound Disaster Events of Hot-Drought and Hot-Humid in Shandong, China

Abstract

The climate risk assessment (CRA) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating hazards, exposure, and vulnerability by integrating multiple methodologies. Previous research demonstrated that the impact of compound disasters on socioeconomic activities extends beyond a mere aggregation of individual hazard effects. This study aims to conduct a climate risk assessment for compound disaster events of hot-drought and hot-humid and employ an atmospheric reanalysis dataset (ERA5) to obtain precipitation, temperature, and humidity across 16 cities in Shandong Province, China. The findings revealed that between 1979 and 2019, the frequency of hot and drought compound events fluctuated, whereas the occurrence of hot and humid compound events displayed a significant increasing trend. Specifically, the frequency of hot and humid compound events across Shandong Province from 2010 to 2019 was 77% higher than that observed from 1979 to 1989. We identified 12 vulnerability, exposure, and capacity indicators, including two compound hazard events. Using the CRA framework, this study applied the entropy method to evaluate the weight factors of the indicators in risk assessment, enabling a systematic risk assessment of summer compound events in the region. The results offer a ranking of urban compound disaster risks for 16 cities and provide valuable insights for local governments to enhance risk identification efficiency and strengthen disaster prevention and mitigation strategies.

요지

IIPCC는 기후 위험도 평가(Climate Risk Assessment, CRA)를 위해 여러 방법론을 통합하여 위험성, 노출성, 취약성을 평가하는 포괄적인 프레임워크를 제공하고 있다. 기후위험도 평가에 대한 기존 연구에서 복합재난이 사회⋅경제적 활동에 미치는 영향은 개별 재난의 위험을 단순히 더한 것 보다도 더 영향을 미친다는 것을 입증하였다. 본 연구에서는 고온-가뭄 및 고온-습윤 복합재난에 대한 기후 위험도를 평가하는 것을 목적으로 하며, 이를 위해 atmospheric reanalysis dataset (ERA5)에서 제공하는 자료를 활용하였다. 즉, 중국 산둥성 내 16개 도시에 대한 강수량, 기온, 습도 자료들을 이용하였고, 분석을 수행한 결과, 1979년부터 2019년까지 고온-가뭄 복합재난의 발생 빈도는 변동성을 보인 반면, 고온-습윤 복합재난은 뚜렷한 증가 추세가 나타났다. 특히, 2010-2019년 동안 산둥성 전역에서 발생한 고온-습윤 복합재난의 빈도는 1979-1989년 대비 77% 증가한 것을 확인하였다. 또한, 위험도 평가를 위해 두 가지 복합재난 유형의 지표를 포함하여 취약성, 노출성, 대응 역량에 대해 총 13개의 지표를 선정하였다. CRA framework를 활용하여 지표 간의 상대적 중요도를 평가하고자 엔트로피 가중치 방법을 적용하였으며, 해당 지역의 여름철 복합재난에 대한 체계적인 위험도 평가를 수행하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 산둥성 내 16개 도시에 대한 복합재난의 위험도를 순위화함으로써, 지방 정부가 보다 효과적으로 위험을 식별하고 재해 예방 및 완화 전략을 강화하는 데 있어 중요한 시사점을 제공할 것으로 판단된다.

1. Introduction

Compound Hot-Drought events (CHDEs) represent one of the most significant types of compound extreme events (Vogel et al., 2019). Research has demonstrated that the frequency has increased in response to global warming (Mazdiyasni and AghaKouchak, 2015) and is projected to rise further in the future (Hao et al., 2018). The occurrence of short-term heat waves poses substantial health risks, particularly to vulnerable populations with pre-existing conditions, leading to increased morbidity and mortality (Beggs et al., 2019). This impact is especially pronounced in developing countries where adaptive capacity remains limited (Guo et al., 2018). As global temperatures continue to escalate, the increasing prevalence of hot events is expected to impose severe challenges on socio-economic systems. However, a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted characteristics of future hot events and their evolutionary dynamics under global warming scenarios remains insufficient, highlighting the need for further research.
High temperatures and humidity in summer pose a serious threat to human health (Rogers et al., 2021), as the high concentration of water vapor in the air hinders the body’s ability to dissipate heat, thereby intensifying heat stress and exacerbating health risks in humid conditions (Matthews et al., 2017). Consequently, the convergence of extreme heat and high humidity places a more severe physiological strain on the human body than high temperatures alone (Vanos and Grundstein, 2020). The superposition of high temperature and humidity has a more profound impact on human activities and overall well-being compared to dry heat (Doan et al., 2016; Dong et al., 2023). Therefore, integrating temperature and humidity in climate assessments is essential for understanding the specific characteristics and risks associated with compound Hot-Humid event.
A comprehensive characterization of compound Hot-Drought event requires a multidimensional approach that accounts for their duration, frequency, intensity, and severity. Existing studies on these events have employed various definitions based on either absolute thresholds or fixed percentiles, leading to inconsistencies in classification (Brown, 2020). As climate model simulations indicate a progressive intensification of global warming, the reliance on empirical thresholds and historical criteria to identify compound Hot-Drought event fails to adequately account for warming trends and localized thermal adaptation. This limitation hinders a more precise scientific understanding of compound climate events (Zhang et al., 2022). Therefore, conducting in-depth research that integrates short-term thermal variability is crucial for capturing evolving trends in compound hot-drought events.
In China, compound hot and humid events occur most frequently in southern China, and they also occur in large areas in eastern coastal cities, especially during the dog days of summer, which aggravates the impact of this event (Wang et al., 2019). However, hot and humid events are a compound phenomenon of high temperature and high humidity, and the harm to human health is much greater than the superposition of single events (Raymond et al., 2021). Scientific understanding of their distinct characteristics remains limited.
Many studies for risk assessment were performed for flood, drought, and other single disasters, however, the risk assessment for compound disasters was not researched in the past. The flood risk assessments using grid and flood map based indicators by Wang et al. (2023), Wang, Kim, Kang et al. (2024), and Wang, Kim, Kim et al. (2024) were performed. Also, the different types of risk index were estimated for the risk assessments (Park et al., 2006; Lim et al., 2007; Bak et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2018; Joo et al., 2019). Therefore, this study selects the risk factors and indicators of the factors based on the previous work and IPCC for the risk assessment of compound Hot-Drought and Hot-Humidity disaster events.
With population aging and rapid urbanization, China is experiencing a growing number of individuals vulnerable to compound events, posing significant challenges for risk management and regional adaptation strategies. Moreover, the growth rate of the population aged 60 group and above has surged in recent years, making China the fastest-aging country globally. The rising prevalence of age-related diseases, such as hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular conditions, coupled with the increasing incidence of chronic illnesses among urban elderly populations, further exacerbates the risks associated with compound events (Ma et al., 2015). Given these compound events, a comprehensive assessment of the future evolution is essential for developing effective adaptation strategies and risk mitigation policies.
The objectives of this study are as follows (Fig. 1):
Fig. 1
Risk Assessment Procedure of Compound Events in Shandong Priovince, China
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g001.jpg
(1) Spatiotemporal Analysis of Compound and Single Events
Utilizing decadal intervals as the fundamental unit of analysis, this study conducts a comprehensive spatiotemporal assessment of hot events, drought events, humid events, compound Hot-Drought event (CHDE), and compound Hot-Humid event (CHHE) in Shandong Province, China, based on ERA5 reanalysis data (1979-2019) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The study aims to characterize the behavioral patterns of both single and compound events, examine their decadal trends, explore the interrelationship between compound and single events, and enhance the understanding of compound event dynamics in China.
(2) Risk Assessment of Compound Events
Leveraging historical statistical data, this study conducts a compound event risk assessment across 16 prefecture-level cities in Shandong Province. The objective is to enhance disaster preparedness, enhance adaptive capacity to compound climate hazards, and minimize economic losses and human casualties.

2. Study Area and Data Resources

2.1 Research Area

Shandong Province is situated between 114°48′-122°42′E longitude and 34°23′-38°17′N latitude, spanning approximately 721.03 km from east to west and 437.28 km from north to south, with a total land area of 155,800 km2. As of November 2020, the province had a male population of 51,432,931 (50.66%) and a female population of 50,094,522 (49.34%), resulting in a sex ratio (males per 100 females) of 102.67, reflecting a 0.34 percentage point increase compared to the sixth national census. By the end of 2023 the population aged 60 and above reached 23.91 million, constituting 23.62% of the total population. Shandong Province has the largest elderly population in China, characterized by a high absolute number, rapid growth rate, and an accelerating aging trend, presenting significant demographic and socio-economic challenges. Land use types are shown in Fig. 2(b).
Fig. 2
Study Area of Shandong Province
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g002.jpg

2.2 Data Resources

The climate data used in this study consist of bias-corrected near-surface meteorological variables from the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA5). This dataset is derived using the same methodology as the widely utilized Water, Energy, and Climate Change (WATCH) forcing data, ensuring consistency and comparability in climate analysis. The dataset has been adjusted for altitude effects and bias-corrected at the monthly scale using data from the Climate Research Unit (CRU)—which accounts for temperature, diurnal temperature range, cloud cover, wet days, and precipitation fields—and the Global Precipitation Climate Centre (GPCC), which is specifically used for precipitation fields. The data are provided on 0.5° gridded resolution. Consequently, when utilizing ECMWF’s ERA5 dataset, the critical step of data variation correction can be omitted, ensuring streamlined and reliable climate analysis.
We selected the near-surface air temperature dataset to calculate the daily maximum temperature, used Rainfall flux to calculate SPI to define drought events, and used near-surface air temperature, surface air pressure, and near-surface specific humidity to calculate the relative humidity (RH) of the surface to define humid events.
The risk assessment of urban compound events is typically conducted using the indicator-based method combined with a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). In this study, four key components are considered: hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and capacity, with a total of 13 indicators quantified and analyzed to comprehensively evaluate urban disaster risk. Utilizing urban-scale weather grid data and statistical yearbook data, this study employs the entropy weight method for calculating weighing values of indicators to conduct a flood risk assessment at the urban level in Shandong Province, China. The risk scores (hazard levels) for each component are derived from the corresponding evaluation indicators within the four-part assessment framework. A higher score indicates a greater risk, highlighting the vulnerability and exposure of specific urban areas. The disaster factors considered in this study include compound hot-drought events and compound hot-humid events, both of which are primarily driven by extreme heat. High temperatures contribute to increased surface air humidity in summer while simultaneously reducing precipitation frequency across different regions. These events result from a combination of natural environmental conditions and urban development factors. Exposure broadly refers to human and material assets directly affected by disasters, encompassing a macro-level assessment of risk. Vulnerability, in contrast, provides a more detailed classification of exposure, offering a refined evaluation of susceptibility to disaster impacts. Additionally, recovery capacity reflects a city’s ability to withstand disasters by leveraging available human and material resources. This metric serves as an indicator of local government efforts in disaster mitigation and loss reduction (Table 1). This is an assessment of two compound disasters, so in the disaster part, we calculated them separately, so the weights are 1 separately.
Table 1
Classification of Disaster Risk Factors and Indicators
Risk factor Indicator Data sources
Hazard Hot-Drought event European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalyzes (ERA5)
Hot-Humid event
Exposure Portion of agricultural land Resource and Environment Science and Data Center (RESDC)
GDP Shandong Province Statistical Yearbook (SPSY)
Population density
Fixed assets investment
Vulnerability Portion of cultivated land Resource and Environment Science and Data Center (RESDC)
Elderly population density Shandong Province Statistical Yearbook (SPSY)
Disposable income
Number of self-employed individuals
Capacity Disaster prevention facility density AutoNavi
Drainage network density Shandong Province Statistical Yearbook (SPSY)

3. Methodology

3.1 Drought Events

The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is well established in describing the occurrence and severity of drought events. This is a method of assessing the severity of drought in a region based solely on precipitation data and has been shown to have high reliability in analyzing specific events (Meseguer-Ruiz et al., 2024). The SPI method offers several advantages, including computational efficiency, high accuracy in drought event assessments, methodological simplicity, and minimal data requirements, making it a preferred tool in drought analysis. In this study, we employ the traditional SPI calculation method (Thomas and McKee, 1993), rather than moment estimation or maximum likelihood estimation, as these alternative approaches are more susceptible to computational errors. By adhering to the standard calculation method, we ensure greater accuracy and consistency in drought assessments.
(1)
SPI=Piuσ
Where Pi is the precipitation in the ei-th month of the study period; u is the mean of the study series during the entire study period; and σ is the standard deviation.
There are multiple approaches to calculating the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), with the mean and standard deviation-based method being the most reliable in minimizing calculation errors. When selecting the research subject and regression period, two primary methods are commonly used: year-based selection and month-based selection (Abu Arra and Şişman, 2024).
1. Year-based selection involves calculating the SPI by aggregating precipitation over N consecutive months within a given year. A typical example is using precipitation from June, July, and August (JJA) in the year to compute the summer SPI.
2. Month-based selection calculates the SPI for a specific month over multiple consecutive year. For instance, selecting June precipitation over 40 consecutive years allows for the identification of long-term precipitation patterns.
The month-based method enables the identification of long-term precipitation trends while providing valuable insights for sustainable urban system development. effectively minimizing errors caused by intra-annual seasonal precipitation variability. Given these advantages, this study adopts the month-based method for SPI calculation. Additionally, the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) provides a classification system for drought events based on SPI thresholds (Table 2).
Table 2
SPI Definition and Classification
Classification Definition SPI Value
1 Non-drought -0.5 < SPI
2 Mild Drought -1.0 < SPI ≦ -0.5
3 Moderate Drought -1.5 < SPI ≦ -1.0
4 Severe Drought -2.0 < SPI ≦ -1.5
5 Extreme Drought SPI ≦ -2.0

3.2 Hot Event

The definition of hot events varies across different studies, with two commonly used approaches: threshold-based methods and observation-based methods (Yu et al., 2022). The threshold-based method effectively identifies hot anomalies by setting predefined temperature thresholds; however, it has regional limitations. For instance, the 90th percentile temperature threshold in equatorial regions is significantly higher than that in polar regions. Conversely, the observation-based method may not fully capture the spatial variability of hot anomalies but provides a more intuitive reflection of critical temperature thresholds relevant to human activities and ecosystems. For example, agricultural crop growth depends on a specific temperature range rather than an absolute hot threshold. Considering these factors, this study adopts the hot event criterion of T 35 ℃, as defined by the China Meteorological Administration, to identify hot events in the study area.

3.3 Humid Event

Relative humidity (RH) is used as a criterion for defining wet events (Kohonen, 1982). According to the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), human discomfort increases significantly in summer when air temperatures exceed 33 ℃ and RH surpasses 60%. Given this threshold, humid events cannot be analyzed as independent occurrences, as they are strongly influenced by air temperature. Therefore, after identifying humid events, it is essential to integrate air temperature data to examine the patterns of Hot-Humid event and assess the associated risks faced by different cities. Based on available ERA5 reanalysis data, the calculation of relative humidity (RH) requires specific humidity, atmospheric pressure, and air temperature (Anderson, 1936; Castellví et al., 1996; Sahin and Cigizoglu, 2013). The specific calculation process is outlined as follows:
(2)
es=6112×exp(17.67tt+243.5)
(3)
e=qp0.622+0.378ea
(4)
RH=ees
Where t air temperature (℃); q is specific humidity; p is surface air pressure (Pa); e is e is water vapor pressure; es is saturated water vapor pressure (hPa).

3.4 Compound Disaster Events of Hot-Drought and Hot-Humidity

This study defines two types of compound event: composite compound Hot-Drought event and humid and hot event. These events are determined by the occurrence of individual events, with matching determined based on predefined threshold criteria. The criteria for defining individual events are based on fixed thresholds, as detailed in Table 3.
Table 3
Compound Event Definition and Classification
Compound event Definition Source
Hot and drought event 35 °C ≦ T, and SPI ≦ -1 China Meteorological Administration (http://www.cma.gov.cn/)
Humid and hot event 35 °C ≦ T, and RH ≧ 60%
Since the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is predominantly calculated on a monthly scale, it provides a more accurate representation of seasonal variations and historical trends. Consequently, if the SPI value for a given month is determined to be -1.4, this implies that when analyzing compound events, the SPI value for each day within that month is uniformly considered to be -1.4.

3.5 Entropy Method for Estimating Weights of Risk Factors and Indicators

After identifying the compound events, the next step involves quantifying the frequency across 16 prefecture-level cities in Shandong Province, China. By integrating the data presented in Table 1, an original dataset for evaluating urban compound disasters is established. In general, hazard part, exposure part, and vulnerability part contribute to an increased risk of urban compound event, whereas capacity part serves to mitigate these risks. Consequently, when applying min-max normalization, the capacity part must be inversely standardized to ensure proper representation. The entropy weight method is utilized to quantify the relative importance of each factor (Feng et al., 2024), the specific weighting steps are as follows:
(5)
fij=bij+1i=1k(bij+1),bij=xijxminxmaxxmin
(6)
i=1kfij1nfij,(j=1kHj=1,0Hj1)
(7)
ωj*1Hji=1k(1Hj)(j=1kωj*=1,0ωj*1)
Where, xij is membership degree; fij is overall sample entropy information; Hj is entropy value; j* is entropy weight vector.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1 Frequencies of Hot, Drought, and Humid Events

Fig. 3(a) illustrates that the difference in the number of humid events between coastal and inland cities is not particularly pronounced. A superficial examination of the total number of events suggests that coastal cities, such as Qingdao and Yantai, experience more humid events than inland cities like Dezhou and Zibo. However, geographical location alone does not fully account for this pattern. Notably, cities such as Jining and Binzhou, which contain numerous lakes and artificial water bodies, exhibit a higher frequency of humid events. This suggests that local hydrological conditions, rather than mere coastal proximity, serve as a key regulatory factor in the formation of summer humid events.
Fig. 3
Frequency and Trends of Climate Events in 16 Cities
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g003.jpg
Fig. 3(b) presents the frequency of drought events, revealing a clear distinction between inland and coastal cities. Inland cities such as Heze and Linyi exhibit a significantly higher frequency of drought months compared to coastal cities like Weihai and Rizhao. From an economic perspective, cities with a high occurrence of drought events are predominantly agricultural, characterized by relatively underdeveloped economies and high population densities. Consequently, their water demand is substantially higher than that of other urban areas, exacerbating the severity of drought conditions and increasing the vulnerability of these regions to water scarcity. The results in Fig. 3(c) indicate that, similar to drought events, hot events exhibit a distinct geographical distribution pattern. Coastal cities such as Qingdao, Rizhao, Weihai, and Yantai experience significantly fewer hot days compared to inland cities like Heze, Liaocheng, and Dezhou. In certain years, some coastal cities recorded no hot events at all. Consequently, analyzing individual events in isolation provides only a limited understanding of the influence of factors such as geographical location and population density. A more comprehensive approach, incorporating multiple interacting variables, is necessary to fully capture the underlying drivers of hot events. The statistical and computational results presented in Fig. 4 reveal distinct trends in the frequency of different extreme climate events. While the overall frequency of humid events has been declining, hot events have exhibited a significant upward trend with pronounced interannual variability. In contrast, the frequency of drought events follows a fluctuating pattern rather than a consistent trend. Given that the occurrence of individual events is influenced by multiple interacting factors, a more systematic approach is required—one that integrates these events for a comprehensive analysis of compound climate risks.
Fig. 4
Frequency Trends of Compound Events in 16 Cities
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g004.jpg

4.2 Frequencies of compound Hot-Drought and Hot-Humid disaster events

The statistical results of compound events, as illustrated in Fig. 4(a), indicate that inland cities generally experience a higher frequency of compound Hot-Humid event. While the occurrence of humid events as independent phenomena remains relatively low in inland regions, the consistently high summer temperatures in these areas exacerbate the impact of compound Hot-Humid event, posing significant risks. Similarly, inland cities are more vulnerable to compound Hot-Drought events, further intensifying climate-related challenges.
Comparing the decadal trend analysis in Figs. 4 and 5 projections suggest that the impact of compound events on inland cities will continue to increase in the future. This trend underscores the necessity for enhanced climate adaptation strategies and risk mitigation measures tailored to inland regions.
Fig. 5
Frequencies of Compound Events in 16 Cities
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g005.jpg

4.3 Risk Assessment for Compound Hot-Drought and Hot-Humid Events

The weights of each evaluation criterion and the comprehensive disaster risk ranking of the 16 cities were determined using the Entropy method. Computed weight values are presented in Table 4. Since capacity serves as a resilience indicator, and the objective is to assess disaster risk, Eq. (8) was applied to derive the final risk ranking.
(8)
Rank=(Hazard)2+(Exposure)2+(Vulnerability)2+(1Capacity)2
Table 4
Weight Values for Risk Factors and Indicators
Risk factor Indicator Weight
Hazard Hot-Drought event 1
Hot-Humid event 1
Exposure Share of agricultural land 0.2756
GDP 0.1299
Population density 0.3166
Fixed assets investment 0.2779
Vulnerability Share of cultivated land 0.1091
Elderly population density 0.4564
Disposable income 0.0952
Number of self-employed individuals 0.3393
Capacity Disaster prevention facility density 0.3281
Drainage network density 0.6029
The calculation results presented in Figs. 6 and 7 indicate that coastal cities generally have a lower probability of experiencing compound event disturbances and impacts compared to inland cities. Although coastal regions exhibit higher humidity levels, their relatively lower summer temperatures and more humid climate create a more favorable environment for human habitation. In contrast, inland cities are more frequently affected by compound events.
Fig. 6
The Assessment Results of Risk Factors for Compound Events
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g006.jpg
Fig. 7
The Assessment Results of Compound Events
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g007.jpg
Regarding exposure and vulnerability, these factors are primarily influenced by economic activity and population mobility rather than geographical location. Regions with high exposure and vulnerability risks are characterized by dense populations and developed economies, making them particularly susceptible to significant socio-economic disruptions in the event of a compound event.
In terms of capacity, cities with advanced economies and high population densities tend to exhibit stronger disaster resilience due to well-developed infrastructure and sufficient governmental resources for rapid disaster response and recovery. Conversely, areas with weaker capacity are primarily concentrated in Shandong Province’s major grain-producing regions, particularly Linyi and Dezhou, which are situated on expansive plains. As a result, these agricultural cities face greater challenges in disaster response and recovery when confronted with compound events, highlighting the need for enhanced adaptive capacity in such regions.
The final calculation results, as shown in Fig. 8, reveal distinct spatial and socio-economic patterns in compound event risk across Shandong Province. From a socio-economic perspective, Qingdao and Jinan—two cities characterized by developed economies and high population densities—exhibit the highest compound event risks. Geographically, inland cities located in the western and southwestern regions of the province face greater exposure to compound disasters, whereas coastal areas generally experience lower risk levels. In terms of disaster-driving factors, although Weihai City has seldom encountered compound events, its relatively underdeveloped economy, severe population aging, and inadequate infrastructure contribute to an elevated disaster risk. These findings highlight the multifaceted nature of compound event vulnerability, emphasizing the need for region-specific mitigation strategies.
Fig. 8
The Assessment Results of Hazard Factors for Compound Events
kosham-2025-25-2-33-g008.jpg

4.4 Discussion

The ERA5 dataset has a spatial resolution of 0.5° × 0.5°, which is insufficient for detailed urban-scale analysis. To enhance spatial resolution, Kriging interpolation was applied, refining the dataset to 0.25° × 0.25°. However, since the dataset consists of gridded reanalysis data rather than direct observations from meteorological stations, the effectiveness of resolution enhancement through Kriging interpolation remains limited. Notably, when attempting to further interpolate to 0.1°, significant information loss occurs. Thus, despite the bias correction applied to the climate dataset, the relatively coarse spatial resolution may introduce uncertainties in statistical analyses and computational outcomes.
In assessing the compound disaster risk of 16 cities in Shandong Province, the climate dataset is based on historical records from 1979 to 2019, while socio-economic indicators, including population, land use, and GDP, are derived from the 2019 statistical baseline. These temporal discrepancies may influence the accuracy of risk assessments.

5. Conclusion

Utilizing bias-corrected near-surface meteorological data from the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA5) and statistical data from government yearbooks, this study analyzes summer climate events across 16 prefecture-level cities in Shandong Province, China, from 1979 to 2019. The study first examines individual climate events, including droughts, hot events, and humid events, before identifying compound Hot-Drought event and compound Hot-Humid event through an integrated way. A risk assessment of these compound climate events was then conducted for the 16 cities. The findings indicate that geographical location and economic foundations are the most influential factors affecting the severity of these compound events. Additionally, while coastal areas exhibit significantly higher humidity levels than inland regions, the likelihood of compound Hot-Humid event remains lower in these areas. In contrast, inland cities experience a greater impact from compound climate events, highlighting the need for region-specific risk mitigation strategies.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1A2C2091773).

References

1. Abu Arra, A, and Şişman, E (2024) A comprehensive analysis and comparison of SPI and SPEI for spatiotemporal drought evaluation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 196, No. 10, pp. 980.
pmid
2. Anderson, D.B (1936) Relative humidity or vapor pressure deficit. Ecology, Vol. 2, No. 17, pp. 277-282.
crossref pdf
3. Bak, J.U, Kim, D, and Kim, H.S (2016) Assessment of resilience in incheon city - (2) Assessment of future resilienc under climate change using change rate. Journal of the Korean Society of Disaster Prevention, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 119-128.

4. Beggs, P.J, Zhang, Y, Bambrick, H, Berry, H.L, Linnenluecke, M.K, Trueck, S, et al (2019) The 2019 report of the MJA-lancet countdown on health and climate change:A turbulent year with mixed progress. Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 211, No. 11, pp. 490-491.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Brown, S.J (2020) Future changes in heatwave severity, duration and frequency due to climate change for the most populous cities. Weather and Climate Extremes, Vol. 30, pp. 100278.
crossref
6. Castellví, F, Perez, P.J, Villar, J.M, and Rosell, J.I (1996) Analysis of methods for estimating vapor pressure deficits and relative humidity. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 29-45.
crossref
7. Doan, Q, Kusaka, H, and Ho, Q (2016) Impact of future urbanization on temperature and thermal comfort index in a developing tropical city:Ho Chi Minh city. Urban Climate, Vol. 17, pp. 20-31.
crossref
8. Dong, D, Tao, H, and Zhang, Z (2023) Historic evolution of population exposure to heatwaves in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Scientific Reports, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 7401.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Feng, Q, Kim, D, Wang, W, Lee, J, Kim, K, and Kim, H.S (2024) A case study:Evaluation of urban flood resilience based on fuzzy mathematics and VIKOR method in Ulsan metropolitan city, South Korea. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1554-1565.
crossref pdf
10. Guo, Y, Gasparrini, A, Li, S, Sera, F, Vicedo-Cabrera, A.M, de Sousa Zanotti Stagliorio Coelho, M, et al (2018) Quantifying excess deaths related to heatwaves under climate change scenarios:A multicountry time series modelling study. Plos Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. e1002629.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Hao, Z, Hao, F, Singh, V.P, and Zhang, X (2018) Changes in the severity of compound drought and hot extremes over global land areas. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 124022.
crossref pdf
12. Joo, H, Choi, C, Kim, J, Kim, D, Kim, S, and Kim, H.S (2019) A bayesian network-based integrated for flood risk assessment (InFRA). Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 13, pp. 3733.
crossref
13. Kim, J, Choi, C, Lee, J, and Kim, H.S (2017) Damage prediction using heavy rain risk assessment (1) Estimation of heavy rain damage risk index. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 361-370.
crossref
14. Kim, Y, Choi, C, Bae, Y, Kim, D, Kim, D, and Kim, H.S (2018) Indicator development and evaluation of storm and flood resilience using big data analysis (1) Development of resilience indicators. Journal of the Korean Society of Disaster Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 97-107.
crossref pdf
15. Kohonen, T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 59-69.
crossref pdf
16. Lim, W.S, Lee, K.H, Kyung, M.S, and Kim, H.S (2007) Potential risk of flood damage and estimation of design frequency in small basins. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 27, No. 6b, pp. 631-640.

17. Ma, W, Wang, L, Lin, H, Liu, T, Zhang, Y, Rutherford, S, et al (2015) The temperature-mortality relationship in China:An analysis from 66 Chinese communities. Environmental Research, Vol. 137, pp. 72-77.
crossref pmid
18. Matthews, T.K.R, Wilby, R.L, and Murphy, C (2017) Communicating the deadly consequences of global warming for human heat stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, No. 15, pp. 3861-3866.
crossref
19. Mazdiyasni, O, and AghaKouchak, A (2015) Substantial increase in concurrent droughts and heatwaves in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, No. 37, pp. 11484-11489.
crossref
20. Meseguer-Ruiz, O, Serrano-Notivoli, R, Aránguiz-Acuña, A, Fuentealba, M, Nuñez-Hidalgo, I, Sarricolea, P, and Garreaud, R (2024) Comparing SPI and SPEI to detect different precipitation and temperature regimes in Chile throughout the last four decades. Atmospheric Research, Vol. 297, pp. 107085.
crossref
21. Park, S.G, Lee, K.H, Kyung, M.S, and Kim, H.S (2006) Risk of flood damage potential and design frequency. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 26, No. 5b, pp. 489-499.

22. Raymond, C, Matthews, T, Horton, R.M, Fischer, E.M, Fueglistaler, S, Ivanovich, C, et al (2021) On the controlling factors for globally extreme humid heat. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 48, No. 23, pp. e2021GL096082.
crossref pdf
23. Rogers, C.D.W, Ting, M, Li, C, Kornhuber, K, Coffel, E.D, Horton, R.M, et al (2021) Recent increases in exposure to extreme humid-heat events disproportionately affect populated regions. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 48, No. 19, pp. e2021GL094183.
crossref pdf
24. Sahin, S, and Cigizoglu, H.K (2013) The effect of the relative humidity and the specific humidity on the determination of the climate regions in Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Vol. 112, No. 3-4, pp. 469-481.
crossref pdf
25. Thomas, B, and McKee, N.J.D.A (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, Vol. 1, pp. 17-22.

26. Vanos, J.K, and Grundstein, A.J (2020) Variations in athlete heat-loss potential between hot-dry and warm-humid environments at equivalent wet-bulb globe temperature thresholds. Journal of Athletic Training, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 1190-1198.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
27. Vogel, M.M, Zscheischler, J, Wartenburger, R, Dee, D, and Seneviratne, S.I (2019) Concurrent 2018 hot extremes across northern hemisphere due to human-induced climate change. Earth's Future, Vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 692-703.
crossref pdf
28. Wang, P, Leung, L.R, Lu, J, Song, F, and Tang, J (2019) Extreme wet-bulb temperatures in China:The significant role of moisture. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, Vol. 124, No. 22, pp. 11944-11960.
crossref pdf
29. Wang, W, Kim, D, Han, H, Kim, K.T, Kim, S, and Kim, H.S (2023) Flood risk assessment using an indicator based approach combined with flood risk maps and grid data. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 627, pp. 130396.
crossref
30. Wang, W, Kim, D, Kang, Y, Haraguchi, M, Kim, H.S, and Kim, S (2024) Developing a flood risk assessment model with genetic algorithm-based weights. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 642, pp. 131902.
crossref
31. Wang, W, Kim, D, Kim, G, Kim, K.T, Kim, S, and Kim, H.S (2024) Flood risk assessment of the naeseongcheon stream basin, Korea using the grid-based flood risk index. Journal of Hydrology:Regional Studies, Vol. 51, pp. 101619.
crossref
32. Yu, H, Lu, N, Fu, B, Zhang, L, Wang, M, and Tian, H (2022) Hotspots, co-occurrence, and shifts of compound and cascading extreme climate events in Eurasian drylands. Environment International, Vol. 169, pp. 107509.
crossref pmid
33. Zhang, Q, She, D, Zhang, L, Wang, G, Chen, J, and Hao, Z (2022) High sensitivity of compound drought and heatwave events to global warming in the future. Earth's Future, Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. e2022EF002833.
crossref
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •    
  • 159 View
  • 5 Download


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
1014 New Bldg., The Korea Science Technology Center, 22 Teheran-ro 7-gil(635-4 Yeoksam-dong), Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06130, Korea
Tel: +82-2-567-6311    Fax: +82-2-567-6313    E-mail: master@kosham.or.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next